Hi,
On 2022-12-28 09:07:12 -0500, Isaac Morland wrote:
> This is a bit of a bikeshed suggestion, but I'm wondering if you considered
> calling it toast.h? Only because the word is so distinctive within
> Postgres; everybody knows exactly to what it refers.
We have a bunch of toast*.h files already. The new header should pretty much
only contain the types, given how widely the header is going to be
included. So maybe toast_type.h?
Greetings,
Andres Freund