Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Дата
Msg-id 20221214173552.sshklqvwezeo52h3@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-12-14 10:55:31 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I read through 0001 again and I noticed this:
> 
>  typedef struct xl_heap_prune
>  {
>      TransactionId snapshotConflictHorizon;
>      uint16      nredirected;
>      uint16      ndead;
> +    bool        onCatalogAccessibleInLogicalDecoding;
>      /* OFFSET NUMBERS are in the block reference 0 */
>  } xl_heap_prune;
> 
> I think this is unsafe on alignment-picky machines. I think it will
> cause the offset numbers to be aligned at an odd address.
> heap_xlog_prune() doesn't copy the data into aligned memory, so I
> think this will result in a misaligned pointer being passed down to
> heap_page_prune_execute.

I think the offset numbers are stored separately from the record, even
though it doesn't quite look like that in the above due to the way the
'OFFSET NUMBERS' is embedded in the struct. As they're stored with the
block reference 0, the added boolean shouldn't make a difference
alignment wise?

Or am I misunderstanding your point?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fix and document CLUSTER privileges
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Common function for percent placeholder replacement