Re: add \dpS to psql

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:36:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:15:03AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> The main idea behind this work is breaking out privileges into more
>> granular pieces.  If I want to create a role that only runs VACUUM on some
>> tables on the weekend, why ѕhould I have to also give it the ability to
>> ANALYZE, REFRESH, CLUSTER, and REINDEX?  IMHO we should really let the user
>> decide what set of privileges makes sense for their use-case.  I'm unsure
>> the grouping all these privileges together serves much purpose besides
>> preserving ACL bits.
> 
> Hmm.  I'd like to think that we should keep a frugal mind here.  More
> bits are now available, but it does not strike me as a good idea to
> force their usage more than necessary, so grouping all these no-quite
> DDL commands into the same bag does not sound that bad to me.

Okay, it seems I am outnumbered.  I will work on updating the patch to add
an ACL_MAINTAIN bit and a pg_maintain_all_tables predefined role.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com