Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20221203005125.GA2561471@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Overall, this change looks straightforward, and it saves a couple hundred lines. On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > +/* pg_stat_get_numscans */ > +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, numscans); > + > +/* pg_stat_get_tuples_returned */ > +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, tuples_returned); > + > +/* pg_stat_get_tuples_fetched */ > +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, tuples_fetched); Can we hard-code the prefix in the macro? It looks like all of these use the same one. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: