On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:48:21 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 05:29:58PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > Thank you for your review. I agree that an isolation test is required.
> > The attached patch contains the test using the scenario as explained in
> > the previous post.
>
> Cool, thanks. Sorry for my late reply here. I have put my head on
> that for a few hours and could not see why we should not allow that.
> So committed the change after a few tweaks to the tests with the use
> of custom permutations, mainly.
Thank!
> While looking at all that, I have looked at the past threads like [1],
> just to note that this has never been really mentioned.
>
> [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1371225929.28496.YahooMailNeo@web162905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
> --
> Michael
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>