Re: Transparent column encryption

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:45:06 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 28.10.22 12:16, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
[...]

> >    * I wonder if encryption related fields in ParameterDescription and
> >      RowDescription could be optional somehow? The former might be quite
> >      large when using a lot of parameters (like, imagine a large and ugly
> >      "IN($1...$N)"). On the other hand, these messages are not sent in high
> >      frequency anyway...  
> 
> They are only used if you turn on the column_encryption protocol option. 
>   Or did you mean make them optional even then?

I meant even when column_encryption is turned on.

Regards,