Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:46:50PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote:
> > Re: Sandro Santilli
> > > I'm attaching an updated version of the patch. This time the patch is
> > > tested. Nothing changes unless the .control file for the subject
> > > extension doesn't have a "wildcard_upgrades = true" statement.
> > >
> > > When wildcard upgrades are enabled, a file with a "%" symbol as the
> > > "source" part of the upgrade path will match any version and
> > 
> > Fwiw I believe wildcard_upgrades isn't necessary in the .control file.
> > If there are no % files, none would be used anyway, and if there are, it's
> clear
> > it's meant as wildcard since % won't appear in any remotely sane version
> > number.
> 
> I also like the idea of skipping the wildcard_upgrades syntax.
> Then there is no need to have a conditional control file for PG 16 vs. older
> versions.

Here we go. Attached a version of the patch with no
"wildcard_upgrades" controlling it.

--strk;