Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:46:26PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:20 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This looks pretty good to me.  Thanks for picking it up!  I can live
>> with the change to use a global variable; it seems we couldn't quite
>> decide what the scope was for moving stuff into a struct (ie various
>> pre-existing stuff representing the walreceiver's state), but I'm OK
>> with considering that as a pure refactoring project for a separate
>> thread.  That array should be "static", though.
> 
> And with that change and a pgindent, pushed.

Thanks!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com