Re: subtransaction performance
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: subtransaction performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20221011033433.GA1323264@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: subtransaction performance (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: subtransaction performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 02:20:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 03:23:27PM -0700, Zhihong Yu wrote: >> I wonder if SAVEPOINT / subtransaction performance has been boosted since the >> blog was written. > > No, I have not seen any changes in this area since then. Seems there > are two problems --- the 64 cache per session and the 64k on the > replica. In both cases, it seems sizing is not optimal, but sizing is > never optimal. I guess we can look at allowing manual size adjustment, > automatic size adjustment, or a different approach that is more graceful > for larger savepoint workloads. I believe the following commitfest entries might be relevant to this discussion: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/2627/ https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3514/ https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3806/ -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: