On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:30:28AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:28:27PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > If we move to a real jumbling of VariableSetStmt, we should keep the rules
> > consistent with the rest of the jumble code and ignore an explicit "SESSION" in
> > the original command.
>
> Hm, interesting bit, I should study more this area. So the query ID
> calculation actually only cares about the contents of the Nodes
> parsed, while the query string used is the one when the entry is
> created for the first time. It seems like the patch to add
> TransactionStmt nodes into the jumbling misses something here, as we'd
> still compile different query IDs depending on the query string itself
> for simple commands like BEGIN or COMMIT. I'll reply on the other
> thread about all that..
Ah, indeed we have different TransactionStmtKind for BEGIN and START!