Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Дата
Msg-id 20220930004018.2djdrrn7ddxfo5tu@awork3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-09-29 17:31:35 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I already added the necessary packages to the image. I didn't install llvm for
> 32bit because that'd have a) bloated the image unduly b) they can't currently
> be installed in parallel afaics.

> Attached is the patch adding it to CI. To avoid paying the task startup
> overhead twice, it seemed a tad better to build and test 32bit as part of an
> existing task. We could instead give each job fewer CPUs and run them
> concurrently.

Ah, one thing I forgot to mention: The 32bit perl currently can't have a
packaged IO:Pty installed. We could install it via cpan, but it doesn't seem
worth the bother. Hence one skipped test in the 32bit build.

Example run:
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4632556472631296?logs=test_world_32#L249 (scroll to
the bottom)


Onder if we should vary some build options like ICU or the system collation?
Tom, wasn't there something recently that made you complain about not having
coverage around collations due to system settings?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Следующее
От: Yugo NAGATA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench: using prepared BEGIN statement in a pipeline could cause an error