Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:54:14PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Here again, I'd rather put this off and focus on getting the "large
> details" in good enough shape so we can got towards integrating with
> vacuum.

I started a new thread for the SIMD patch [0] so that this thread can
remain focused on the radix tree stuff.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220917052903.GA3172400%40nathanxps13

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com