On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:25:15 +0200
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2022-Sep-08, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I believe this very small bug and its fix are really trivial and could be
> > push out of the way quite quickly. It's just about a bad constraint name
> > fixed by moving one assignation after the next one. This could easily be
> > fixed for next round of releases.
> >
> > Well, I hope I'm not wrong :)
>
> I think you're right, so pushed, and backpatched to 12. I added the
> test case to regression also.
Great, thank you for the additional work on the regression test and the commit!
> For 11, I adjusted the test case so that it didn't depend on an FK
> pointing to a partitioned table (which is not supported there); it turns
> out that the old code is not smart enough to get into the problem in the
> first place. [...]
> It seems fair to say that this case, with pg11, is unsupported and
> people should upgrade if they want better behavior.
That works for me.
Thanks!