On 2022-Jul-15, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Should that sentence be removed from MERGE ?
Removed
On 2022-Jul-18, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 03:43:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Should that sentence be removed from MERGE ?
>
> Also, I think these examples should be more similar.
Agreed, done.
On 2022-Aug-09, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:48:23AM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > So I propose to leave it as
> >
> > If <command>MERGE</command> attempts an <command>INSERT</command>
> > and a unique index is present and a duplicate row is concurrently
> > inserted, then a uniqueness violation error is raised;
> > <command>MERGE</command> does not attempt to avoid such
> > errors by restarting evaluation of <literal>MATCHED</literal>
> > conditions.
>
> I think by "leave it as" you mean "change it to".
> (Meaning, without referencing UPDATE).
Yes. I suppose we could add a parenthical comment, given that it's
likely the most popular option? Feel free to suggest something
specific.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"People get annoyed when you try to debug them." (Larry Wall)