On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 01:02:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... if
>> we want to regard no-superusers as a supported configuration, we
>> probably need to tighten that up. I think it's kind of hopeless,
>
> Yeah, I agree. At least, I'm uninterested in spending any of my
> own time trying to make that usefully-more-secure than it is today.
> If somebody else is interested enough to do the legwork, we can
> look at what they come up with.
Given the current assumptions the code makes about the bootstrap superuser,
I think it makes sense to disallow removing its superuser attribute (at
least via ALTER ROLE NOSUPERUSER). It seems like there is much work to do
before a no-superuser configuration could be formally supported. If/when
such support materializes, it might be possible to remove the restriction
that Robert is proposing.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com