Re: remove more archiving overhead

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kyotaro Horiguchi
Тема Re: remove more archiving overhead
Дата
Msg-id 20220708.105652.1551158050191356887.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: remove more archiving overhead  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
At Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:07:16 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote in 
> Here's an updated patch.

Thinking RFC'ish, the meaning of "may" and "must" is significant in
this description.  On the other hand it uses both "may" and "can" but
I thinkthat their difference is not significant or "can" there is
somewhat confusing.  I think the "can" should be "may" here.

And since "must" is emphasized, doesn't "may" also needs emphasis?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Следующее
От: Yugo NAGATA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add a test for "cannot truncate foreign table"