Re: Bugs in copyfuncs/equalfuncs support for JSON node types

On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:23:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In reviewing Peter's patch to auto-generate the backend/nodes
> support files, I compared what the patch's script produces to
> what is in the code now.  I found several discrepancies in the
> recently-added parse node types for JSON functions, and as far
> as I can see every one of those discrepancies is an error in
> the existing code.  Some of them are relatively harmless
> (e.g. COPY_LOCATION_FIELD isn't really different from
> COPY_SCALAR_FIELD), but some of them definitely are live bugs.
> I propose the attached patch.

Do the missing fields indicate a deficiency in test coverage ?
_copyJsonTablePlan.pathname and _equalJsonTable.plan.

-- 
Justin