On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:14:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> >> To me, oid>=16384 seems more hard-wired than namespace!='pg_catalog'.
>
> > Extensions can be installed into pg_catalog, but they can't get
> > low-numbered OIDs.
>
> Exactly. (To be clear, I had in mind writing something involving
> FirstNormalObjectId, not that you should put literal "16384" in the
> code.)
Actually, 16384 is already used in two other places in check.c, so ...
done like that for consistency.
Also fixes parenthesis, typos, and renames vars.