On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:17:24AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:28:55AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > I've spent some time looking at all the code impacted by a117ceb and
> > 0abc1a0, and I've yet to identify any additional problems besides the one
> > with ResolveOpClass(). However, I'm far from confident in this analysis,
> > and I still need to try out the ereport() approach that Noah suggested. I
> > would welcome any assistance identifying other problem areas.
>
> Ah, I think I am missing something. For example, the code that identifies
> the exclusion operator (immediately following the call to ResolveOpClass())
> is likely subject to a similar problem.
That would not surprise me. Do you have what you need to continue?