Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations
Дата
Msg-id 202205021751.aosyba2mh7bc@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2022-May-02, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> pgoutput.c is relies on relcache callbacks to get notified of changes.
> See the stuff that touches replicate_valid and publications_valid. So
> the walsender should notice the changes immediately.

Hmm, I suppose that makes any changes easy enough to detect.  We don't
need a separate signalling mechanism.

But it does mean that the walsender needs to test the consistency of
[rowfilter, column list, published actions] whenever they change for any
of the current publications and it is working for more than one, and
disconnect if the combination no longer complies with the rules.  By the
next time the replica tries to connect, START_REPLICATION will throw the
error.

> Why would we need to know publications replicated by other walsenders?
> And what if the subscriber is not connected at the moment? In that case
> there'll be no walsender.

Sure, if the replica is not connected then there's no issue -- as you
say, that replica will fail at START_REPLICATION time.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La gente vulgar sólo piensa en pasar el tiempo;
el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash
Следующее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Is Dynamic Tracing in Postgres running on Ubuntu a good choice?