On 2022-04-05 16:42:28 +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
> > Why isn't the obvious thing to do here to provide a way to associate workers
> > with their leaders in shared memory, but to use the existing progress fields
> > to report progress? Then, when querying progress, the leader and workers
> > progress fields can be combined to show the overall progress?
>
> The original intent was this, however the workers
> can exit before the command completes and the
> worker progress data will be lost.
Can't the progress data trivially be inferred by the fact that the worker
completed?