Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20220310005237.GA307769@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I took a look at the latest patch set.
+ <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition">
+ <structfield>indexes_total</structfield> <type>bigint</type>
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ The number of indexes to be processed in the
+ <literal>vacuuming indexes</literal>
+ or <literal>cleaning up indexes</literal> phase. It is set to
+ <literal>0</literal> when vacuum is not in any of these phases.
+ </para></entry>
Could we avoid resetting it to 0 unless INDEX_CLEANUP was turned off or
failsafe kicked in? It might be nice to know how many indexes the vacuum
intends to process. I don't feel too strongly about this, so if it would
add a lot of complexity, it might be okay as is.
BTreeShmemInit();
SyncScanShmemInit();
AsyncShmemInit();
+ vacuum_worker_init();
Don't we also need to add the size of the hash table to
CalculateShmemSize()?
+ * A command type can optionally define a callback function
+ * which will derive Datum values rather than use values
+ * directly from the backends progress array.
I think this can be removed.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: