Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Julien Rouhaud
Тема
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id
20220225164315.c4naqnqb4gdzlpy6@jrouhaud
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
RE: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 05:38:45PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Per some off-list discussion with Julien, we have clearly been talking
> in slightly different terms. So let's summarize the options into what
> theÿ́d actually be:
>
> Option 0: what is int he patch now
>
> Option 1:
> jit_count - number of executions using jit
> total_jit_time - for sum of functions+inlining+optimization+emission time
> min_jit_time - for sum of functions+inlining+optimization+emission time
> max_jit_time - for sum of functions+inlining+optimization+emission time
> mean_jit_time - for sum of functions+inlining+optimization+emission time
> stddev_jit_time - for sum of functions+inlining+optimization+emission time
> jit_functions - number of functions
> jit_inlining_count - number of executions where inlining happened
> jit_optimization_count - number of executions where optimization happened
> jit_emission_count - number of executions where emission happened
>
> Option 2:
> jit_count
> jit_functions
> jit_generation_time
> jit_inlining_count
> jit_inlining_time
> jit_optimization_count
> jit_optimization_time
> jit_emission_count
> jit_emission_time

I'm for option 2, I think it's important to have the timing details for
inlining and optimization and be able to compute correct stats.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Readd use of TAP subtests
От: Melih Mutlu
Дата:
Сообщение: Mingw task for Cirrus CI
FAQ