Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 08:44:08PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> 
> Yeah... I was following a similar track with the initial work last
> year, but I dropped it when the cost of implementation started to grow
> considerably. At the time, though, it looked like some overhauls to the
> stats framework were being pursued? I should read up on that thread.

Do you mean the shared memory stats patchset?  IIUC this is unrelated, as the
beentry stuff Michael was talking about is a different infrastructure
(backend_status.[ch]), and I don't think there are any plans to move that to
dynamic shared memory.