Hi,
On 2022-02-23 10:30:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> So I now propose modifying yesterday's patch thus:
>
> * Reinstantiate the PG_LOG_FATAL enum value, add support macros
> pg_log_fatal, pg_log_fatal_hint, pg_log_fatal_detail.
>
> * Define pg_fatal as pg_log_fatal + exit(1). (This would essentially
> move pg_rewind's definition into logging.h. pg_upgrade will
> define it slightly differently, but the semantics end up the same.)
>
> * Adjust call sites to match.
+1
> I do like this idea because it would not break any existing code
> that expects pg_log_fatal to return. There is likely to be some
> of that in outstanding patches, and this approach would merely
> render it less-than-idiomatic rather than outright broken.
>
> Updating the patch is going to be a bit tedious, so I'm not
> going to do it without buy-in that this solution would be
> okay to commit. Any objections?
+1
Greetings,
Andres Freund