> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:03:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:55:26AM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> >
> > FYI, I've attached this thread to the CF item as an informational one,
> > but as there are some patches posted here, folks may get confused. For
> > those who have landed here with no context, I feel obliged to mention
> > that now there are two alternative patch series posted under the same
> > CF item:
> >
> > * the original one lives in [1], waiting for reviews since the last May
> > * an alternative one posted here from Floris
>
> Ah, I indeed wasn't sure of which patchset(s) should actually be reviewed.
> It's nice to have the alternative approach threads linkied in the commit fest,
> but it seems that the cfbot will use the most recent attachments as the only
> patchset, thus leaving the "original" one untested.
>
> I'm not sure of what's the best approach in such situation. Maybe creating a
> different CF entry for each alternative, and link the other cf entry on the cf
> app using the "Add annotations" or "Links" feature rather than attaching
> threads?
I don't mind having all of the alternatives under the same CF item, only
one being tested seems to be only a small limitation of cfbot.