Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:40:54PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > Okay, I created versions of the patch series for branches 13 and 14 > (.txt files). The one for HEAD is also re-attached. FYI The patch failed today on FreeBSD, while it was previously quite stable on all platforms (https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4551468081479680), with this error: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6360787076775936/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/regression.diffs diff -U3 /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out --- /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:12:52.533086000 +0000 +++ /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:28:00.000524000 +0000 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0; ?column? ---------- - t + f (1 row) I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the patch and discussion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: