Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Justin Pryzby
Тема Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.
Дата
Msg-id 20211229163014.GO24477@telsasoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PublicationActions - use bit flags.  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PublicationActions - use bit flags.  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:18:41AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> For some reason the current HEAD PublicationActions is a struct of
> boolean representing combinations of the 4 different "publication
> actions".
> 
> I felt it is more natural to implement boolean flag combinations using
> a bitmask instead of a struct of bools. IMO using the bitmask also
> simplifies assignment and checking of said flags.

Peter E made a suggestion to use a similar struct with bools last year for
REINDEX.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7ec67c56-2377-cd05-51a0-691104404abe@enterprisedb.com

Alvaro pointed out that the integer flags are better for ABI compatibility - it
would allow adding a new flag in backbranches, if that were needed for a
bugfix.

But that's not very compelling, since the bools have existed in v10...
Also, the booleans directly correspond with the catalog.

+       if (pubform->pubinsert) pub->pubactions |= PUBACTION_INSERT;

This is usually written like:

    pub->pubactions |= (pubform->pubinsert ? PUBACTION_INSERT : 0)

-- 
Justin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Report checkpoint progress in server logs
Следующее
От: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum