On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 20:56:59 -0700
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2021, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, here seem to be some use cases. For example,
> > - when you want to delete the specified number of rows from a table
> > that doesn't have a primary key and contains tuple duplicated.
>
>
> Not our problem…use the tools correctly; there is always the hack
> work-around for the few who didn’t.
>
>
> > - when you want to delete the bottom 10 items with bad scores
> > (without using rank() window function).
>
>
> This one doesn’t make sense to me.
>
> - when you want to delete only some of rows because it takes time
> > to delete all of them.
> >
> >
> This seems potentially compelling though I’d be more concerned about the
> memory aspects than simply taking a long amount of time. If this is a
> problem then maybe discuss it without having a solution-in-hand? But given
> the intense I/O cost that would happen spreading this out over time seems
> acceptable and it should be an infrequent thing to do. Expecting users to
> plan and execute some custom code for their specific need seems reasonable.
>
> So even if Tom’s technical concerns aren’t enough working on this based
> upon these uses cases doesn’t seem of high enough benefit.
Thank you for your comments.
Ok. I agree that there are not so strong use cases.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>