Hi,
On 2021-11-22 20:13:28 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:57:45PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > It does however change symbol binding, basically making all symbols bound
> > eagerly. Which I guess theoretically could be considered an ABI change,
> > because it removes the ability to intercept symbols referenced in a previously
> > loaded shared library, with a subsequently loaded library (e.g. loaded with
> > RTLD_DEEPBIND) function before the symbol is used. But that seems like a
> > stretch. And I think most ELF platforms/linux distributions have/are moving
> > towards using -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro also makes symbols bound eagerly.
>
> I found this really interesting, and I am surprised how things got so
> suboptimal.
It's always been this way on ELF afaict (*).
I don't think anybody would design ELF the same way today. I think it's pretty
clear that defaulting to making symbols interceptable was a bad idea. But it's
where we are...
> Has it always been this way? Is it the use of C++ that is causing this by
> default?
Nope, this is with plain C.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
(*) I guess you can argue it got a tad worse with the increasing use of
position independent executables, but that's a relatively small difference in
the scope of the issue.