Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
Дата
Msg-id
20211118204257.nbp6dh6zt5rvpees@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Mikael Kjellström <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu>
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Hi, On 2021-11-18 12:43:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah. I'm inclined to think we ought to just bite the bullet and fold > CLANG/CLANGXX into the main list of compiler switch probes, so that we > check every interesting one four times. That sounds fairly horrid, > but as long as you are using an accache file it's not really going > to cost that much. (BTW, does meson have any comparable optimization? > If it doesn't, I bet that is going to be a problem.) > > regards, tom lane Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления