Re: [PATCH] pgarchives: parser: handle messages in which Message-ID is missing

On 2021-Nov-04, Célestin Matte wrote:

> > I don't think this should be the responsibility of pglister. As you
> > say, "most MTAs do add this field" -- and the solution is to
> > configure the MTA to do this. We already rely on the MTA to get a
> > lot of other important things right.
> 
> But then these messages will get delivered by pglister but pgarchives
> will fail to archive them, although they do not actually break
> requirements. Shouldn't we follow the RFC here?

Maybe pglister should refuse to deliver messages that don't contain
a Message-Id.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)