Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
Дата
Msg-id
20210921230055.sbdfdli6myiimxvm@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2021-09-21 18:21:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2021-09-21 15:09:11 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> Currently when determining where CoerceToDomainValue can be read,
> >> it evaluates every step in a loop.
> >> But, I think that the expression is immutable and should be solved only
> >> once.
>
> > What is immutable here?
>
> I think Ranier has a point here. The clear intent of this bit:
>
> /*
> * If first time through, determine where CoerceToDomainValue
> * nodes should read from.
> */
> if (domainval == NULL)
> {
>
> is that we only need to emit the EEOP_MAKE_READONLY once when there are
> multiple CHECK constraints. But because domainval has the wrong lifespan,
> that test is constant-true, and we'll do it over each time to little
> purpose.
Oh, I clearly re-skimmed the code too quickly. Sorry for that!
> (AFAICS anyway)
>
> I'm unexcited by the proposed move of the save_innermost_domainval/null
> variables, though. It adds no correctness and it forces an additional
> level of indentation of a good deal of code, as the patch fails to show.
Yea.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата: