Re: when the startup process doesn't

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Justin Pryzby
Тема Re: when the startup process doesn't
Дата
Msg-id 20210606222305.GZ14099@telsasoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: when the startup process doesn't  (Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: when the startup process doesn't  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:49:21PM +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> I have added the proper logs in all of the above scenarios.
> 
> Following is the sample log displayed during server startup when the
> time period is set to 10ms.
> 
> 2021-06-04 19:40:06.390 IST [51116] LOG:  Syncing data directory, elapsed time: 14.165 ms,  current path:
./base/13892/16384_fsm
> 2021-06-04 19:40:06.399 IST [51116] LOG:  Syncing data directory completed after 22.661 ms

|2021-06-04 19:40:07.222 IST [51116] LOG:  Performing crash recovery, elapsed time: 820.805 ms,  current LSN:
0/76F6F10
|2021-06-04 19:40:07.227 IST [51116] LOG:  invalid record length at 0/774E758: wanted 24, got 0
|2021-06-04 19:40:07.227 IST [51116] LOG:  redo done at 0/774E730 system usage: CPU: user: 0.77 s, system: 0.03 s,
elapsed:0.82 s
 

Should it show the rusage ?  It's shown at startup completion since 10a5b35a0,
so it seems strange not to show it here.

+                       log_startup_process_progress("Syncing data directory", path, false);

I think the fsync vs syncfs paths should be distinguished: "Syncing data
directory (fsync)" vs "Syncing data directory (syncfs)".

+               {"log_min_duration_startup_process", PGC_SUSET, LOGGING_WHEN,

I think it should be PGC_SIGHUP, to allow changing it during runtime.
Obviously it has no effect except during startup, but the change will be
effective if the current process crashes.
See also: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210526001359.GE3676@telsasoft.com

+extern void log_startup_process_progress(char *operation, void *data,
+                                         bool is_complete);

I think this should take an enum operation, rather than using strcmp() on it
later.  The enum values might be RECOVERY_START, RECOVERY_END, rather than
having a bool is_complete.

-- 
Justin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Следующее
От: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep