Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Дата
Msg-id 20210606063331.GC297923@rfd.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:22:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I feel like this is committable at this point --- any objections?

(This became commit 40c24bf, "Improve our ability to regurgitate SQL-syntax
function calls.")

> --- a/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c
> +++ b/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c
> @@ -2369,11 +2369,12 @@ _equalFuncCall(const FuncCall *a, const FuncCall *b)

> +    COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(funcformat);

equalfuncs.c has been using COMPARE_COERCIONFORM_FIELD() to ignore differences
in fields of this type.  Does this spot have cause to depart from the pattern?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: vignesh C
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription.
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hook for extensible parsing.