On 2021-Apr-09, Robert Haas wrote:
> Does this need to worry about new partitions getting attached to a
> partitioned table, or old ones getting detached? (Maybe it does
> already, not sure.)
I was pinged because this is listed as an open item. I don't think it
is one. Handling ATTACH/DETACH/DROP is important for overall
consistency, of course, so we should do it eventually, but the fact that
autovacuum runs analyze *at all* for partitioned tables is an enormous
step forward from it not doing so. I think we should treat ATTACH/
DETACH/DROP handling as a further feature to be added in a future
release, not an open item to be fixed in the current one.
Now, if somebody sees a very trivial way to handle it, let's discuss it,
but *I* don't see it.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan)