Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)

On 2021-Apr-07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> OK, I bit the bullet and re-did the logic in the way I had proposed
> earlier in the thread: do the propagation on the collector's side, by
> sending only the list of ancestors: the collector can read the tuple
> change count by itself, to add it to each ancestor.  This seems less
> wasteful.  Attached is v16 which does it that way and seems to work
> nicely under my testing.

Pushed with this approach.  Thanks for persisting with this.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile