Re: Issue with point_ops and NaN

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 17:57 +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > 
> > Getting a consistent behavior shouldn't be hard, but I'm unsure which behavior
> > is actually correct.
> 
> I'd say that this is certainly wrong:
> 
> SELECT point('NaN','NaN') <@ polygon('(0,0),(1,0),(1,1),(0,0)');
> 
>  ?column? 
> ----------
>  t
> (1 row)

Yeah that's what I think too, but I wanted to have confirmation.