Re: Replication sequence
От | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication sequence |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210216133808.5d4a15c0@firost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication sequence (Paolo Saudin <paolosaudin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication sequence
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:10:54 +0100 Paolo Saudin <paolosaudin@gmail.com> wrote: > Il giorno mar 16 feb 2021 alle ore 10:51 Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais < > [...] > > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > > Thank you very much! > So in case the primary server crashes, and the backup one gets live, it > will eventually have different sequences. No. You will just have a gap in the sequence, on both side. And if you decided to promote your standby to production, you'll have to resync the old primary anyway. > I suppose there is no way to > avoid this, isnt'it? You can't avoid gap.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: