On 2021-Jan-20, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> My proposal is to make everything after the ** operator use strict mode
> (patch attached). I think this shouldn't be backpatched, just applied to
> the v14. Other suggestions?
I think changing the mode midway through the operation is strange. What
do you think of requiring for ** that mode is strict? That is, if ** is
used and the mode is lax, an error is thrown.
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile