Hi,
On 2020-12-08 11:05:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've now studied this patch and it seems sane to me, although
> I wondered why you wrote "extern"s here:
Brainfart...
> Other than that nit, please finish this up and push it so I can finish
> the generic-subscripting patch.
Done.
> > WRT the prototype, I think it may be worth removing most of the types
> > from llvmjit.h. Worth keeping the most common ones, but most aren't used
> > all the time so terseness doesn't matter that much, and
> > the llvm_pg_var_type() would suffice.
>
> Hm, that would mean redoing llvm_pg_var_type() often wouldn't it?
> I don't have a very good feeling for how expensive that is, so I'm
> not sure if this seems like a good idea or not.
It should be fairly cheap - it's basically one hashtable lookup.
Greetings,
Andres Freund