Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets
Дата
Msg-id 20201124015740.GC3046@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think we are getting a bit sidetracked here with the message wording. The
> reason I looked at this was that "remove socket file and retry" is never an
> appropriate action with abstract sockets.  And on further analysis, it is
> never an appropriate action with any Unix-domain socket (because with file
> system namespace sockets, you never get an EADDRINUSE, so it's dead code).
> So my proposal here is to just delete that line from the hint and leave the
> rest the same.

Reading again this thread, +1 on that.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online verification of checksums
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)