Hi,
On 2020-11-20 16:19:03 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Pushed a fix similar to your patch, but I put the wait_for_catchup() before
> running pg_rewind. The point of inserting the 'in A, after C was promoted'
> row is that it's present in B when pg_rewind runs.
Hm - don't we possibly need *both*? Since post pg_rewind recovery starts
at the previous checkpoint, it's quite possible for C to get ready to
answer queries before that record has been replayed?
Thanks,
Andres Freund