Re: pg_upgrade analyze script

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_upgrade analyze script
Дата
Msg-id 20201110012104.GB1887@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade analyze script  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_upgrade analyze script
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> You should just remove those calls.  There is no need to replace them with
> vacuumdb calls.  The reason those calls were there is that they were testing
> the generated script itself.  If the script is gone, there is no more need.
> There are already separate tests for testing vacuumdb.

True, 102_vacuumdb_stages.pl already does all that.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Adding an aminsert() hint that triggers bottom-up index deletion for UPDATEs that can't use HOT
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions