On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 04:20:05PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> But there are many people that aren't happy with the current hashing
> approach. If we're going to move the computation in core, shouldn't
> we listen to their complaints and let them pay some probably quite
> high overhead to base the hash on name and/or fully qualified name
> rather than OID?
> For instance people using logical replication to upgrade to a newer
> version may want to easily compare query performance on the new
> version, or people with multi-tenant databases may want to ignore the
> schema name to keep a low number of different queryid.
Well, we have to consider how complex the user interface has to be to
allow more flexibility. We don't need to allow every option a user will
want.
With a version number, we have the ability to improve the algorithm or
add customization, but for the first use, we are probably better off
keeping it simple.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee