Re: Probably typo in multixact.c

On Thu, Oct  8, 2020 at 10:26:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:15:35AM +0000, Hou, Zhijie wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > In multixact.c I found some comments like the following:
> > 
> > *        Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED
> > * Discard the local MultiXactId cache like in AtEOX_MultiXact
> > 
> > Since there's no function called "AtEOX_MultiXact" in the code,
> > I think the "AtEOX_MultiXact" may be a typo.
> > 
> > AtEOXact_MultiXact seems to be the right function here.
> 
> Yes, that looks like a simple typo to me as well.
> AtEOXact_MultiXact() shares portions of the logics in
> PostPrepare_MultiXact and multixact_twophase_postcommit.

FYI, this patch was applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee