Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
Дата
Msg-id 20201006152211.GC3686@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct  6, 2020 at 11:06:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Hm, does it matter?  I think those wrappers send the output to /dev/null
> >> anyway.
> 
> > The debian ones don't, because they consider it useful information to the
> > user. I'd say that it is, especially in the case of pg_upgrade. (Less so
> > about initdb, but still a bit -- especially when creating secondary
> > clusters)
> > The redhat ones I believe sent it to a logfile, not to /dev/null. Meaning
> > it's not in your face, but it still contains incorrect instructions.
> 
> OK.  FWIW, I'd vote for separate --no-instructions and --no-scripts
> switches.

Works for me.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)
Следующее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Yet another fast GiST build