On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:20:01AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In these days when we run almost all test cases in parallel, it's
>> frequently not that easy to tie a "TRAP: ..." message in the log
>> to nearby log messages. (The postmaster's subsequent complaint
>> often helps, but it could be some distance away in the log; and
>> good luck untangling things if more than one Assert failure happens
>> concurrently.) We could add a simple bread crumb trail by
>> including the process's PID in such messages. Any objections?
>
> +1
+1. (log_line_prefix includes %p in its default configuration for the
TAP tests).
--
Michael