Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
Дата
Msg-id 20201002143207.qt7re34mhsfmfi6f@development
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:19:44AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>
> ...
>
>I've been able to confirm that the problem goes away if we stop adding
>the gather merge paths in generate_useful_gather_paths().
>
>I'm not sure yet what conclusion that leads us to. It seems to be that
>the biggest clue remains that all of this works correctly unless one
>of the selected columns (which happens to be a pathkey at this point
>because it's a DISTINCT query) contains a volatile expression.
>

Yeah. It seems to me this is a bug in get_useful_pathkeys_for_relation,
which is calling find_em_expr_for_rel and is happy with anything it
returns. But this was copied from postgres_fdw, which however does a bit
more here:

     if (pathkey_ec->ec_has_volatile ||
         !(em_expr = find_em_expr_for_rel(pathkey_ec, rel)) ||
         !is_foreign_expr(root, rel, em_expr))

So not only does it explicitly check volatility of the pathkey, it also
calls is_foreign_expr which checks the expression for mutable functions.

The attached patch seems to fix this, but it only adds the check for
mutable functions. Maybe it should check ec_has_volatile too ...


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: enable_incremental_sort changes query behavior
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)