Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Дата
Msg-id 20200929140944.GA5330@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Jun-01, Craig Ringer wrote:

> On 28 May 2018 at 15:06, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> > Per topic, the Pg makefiles install pg_regress (for use by extensions) and
> > htey install the isolationtester, but they don't install
> > pg_isolation_regress.
> >
> > We should install it too.

I happened to come across this thread by accident, and I tend to agree
that we need to install both isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress to
the pgxs dirs, just like we do pg_regress.  I can't find that
isolationtester is installed anywhere though; maybe that changed after
you posted this.  Anyway, this version of the patch installs both.

I did search for evidence in the Makefile's git log that would remove a
recipe for installing isolationtester; couldn't find anything.

> I'm wondering if I should add ISOLATION support to PGXS too, like we have
> REGRESS .

This was covered by Michael's d3c09b9b1307 a few months after you
posted.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Retry Cached Remote Connections for postgres_fdw in case remote backend gets killed/goes away
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BLOB / CLOB support in PostgreSQL